***UPDATE*** MAY 14, 2013

Monster Doctor and BABY MURDERER, Kermit Gosnell was found guilty on three counts of first-degree murder on Monday and under PA law would face the death penalty. Unfortunately, this murderous coward decided to enter into an agreement with the district attorney to NOT file appeals in order that he be granted life in prison. In my opinion, this is a sickening end to despicable crimes this monster engaged in for decades. I would have loved to see someone hold him down, jab a big pair of scissors in his fat neck and snip his spinal cord while he cried & begged for life! Indeed ~ I believe when his “time” does come, GOD will judge him swiftly and send him straight to hell & the devil himself. Another asshole! ~ dfh 

****************************************************************************************

Dr. Kermit Gosnell, the late-term abortionist  found guilty on Monday of murdering three babies who were born alive in his  dirty clinic, has been spared the death penalty after striking a plea  deal.

The doctor, who killed the newborns by  snipping their necks with scissors at the now-shuttered Women’s Medical Society Clinic in West  Philadelphia, will serve two consecutive  life sentences without parole after giving up his right to appeal.

Gosnell will be sentenced on Wednesday in the  death of the third baby, as well as for the involuntary manslaughter conviction  after a patient died at the clinic following a drug overdose.

He will also be sentenced for hundreds of  lesser counts of violating the state’s  ‘informed  consent’ law, which says there must be a 24-hour waiting period  before  an abortion.

~Lydia Warren~ mail Online

******************************************************************************************

There seems to be a media black-out of the news coming out at the trial of monster Kermit Gosnell and his abortion mill house of horrors. The silence from President Obama has also been deafening, however; this writer is not surprised considering his comments about abortion. Then Senator Obama, voted to allow babies born alive in abortion attempts to be treated like medical waste and tossed aside. He voted to allow them to be left to die. Alone and gasping for their first and last breaths, before the newly born life was snuffed out forever.

That’s right. Obama wouldn’t even want a child’s life to be saved were he or she to survive the abortion attempt. He believes that babies who are born alive during an abortion attempt should legally be left to die. In his own words: “As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child — however way you want to describe it — is now outside the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that it’s nonviable but there’s, let’s say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead…

Whatever your politics, President Obama voted to protect such monsters. A monster who allegedly laughed and cracked jokes while babies were screaming as he cut their necks and killed them, according to testimony. A monster who allegedly kept severed feet in jars, in a house of horrors where a worker testified it “rained fetuses.” A house of horrors where there was no future nor any chance of escape for innocent children delivered into toilets and drowned or stabbed in the neck as their eyes were opening for the first time and discovering the world around them. A world that was never allowed to welcome that miraculous life, and is much darker place because of it.

Citizens are rightly outraged and they are demanding answers. Why is the trial of a “man” accused of slaughtering innocent babies being ignored? Whether you’re pro-life or pro-choice does not matter in this particular case. This is ultimately a matter of preserving and protecting innocent human life. And the media’s obvious indifference to the suffering and killing of born alive infants is difficult to bear. Of course, liberals love to finance and raise awareness about causes that shelter helpless animals or feed starving children in third world countries (two admittedly noble endeavors), but when clear injustices occur at home — and don’t advance their “abortion on demand” narrative — they are conspicuously silent. Why am I not surprised?

More to the point, an infant who can scream and jump outside his/her mother’s womb is a human being — and therefore should unquestionably be granted citizenship rights. This is something one would hope every American with a soul and conscience could agree upon. (Sadly that’s not the case). Meanwhile, any television network that refuses to bring these harrowing details to light (yet unfailingly reminds the public that Republicans are waging a “war on women”) should be treated with contempt. What about the real war on living, sentient human beings? Do they really have nothing to say about that?

A witness testified that she saw at least five aborted babies moving, breathing and in one case,” screeching” after Gosnell performed the late-term procedure. One baby was so big that Gosnell joked “This baby is going to walk me home.” She said she also saw Gosnell use scissors to “snip” the neck of newborns who were moving after the procedure. Another witness testified that she snipped the spines of at least 10 babies during unorthodox abortions at a West Philadelphia clinic and that Dr. Kermit Gosnell and another employee did the same to terminate pregnancies.

The more I read about this trial and the actions of one sick and twisted man — and his cowardly and ultimately weak-kneed staff — the more I realize how far the MSM will go to hide what really goes on behind closed doors in some of the nation’s so-called “abortion” clinics. Thankfully, though, actual journalists aren’t letting them get away with it. ~dfh

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men ? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage  – the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving). The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving). The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, ”But he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!” “That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentleman, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works! The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D. – Professor of Economics.