The blame game is Obama’s ‘claim to fame’ as far as I’m concerned. He loves taking credit for successes (mostly those of others) while minimizing his own dismal failures. Politicians all tend to relish an opportunity to pass on blame for a catastrophic failure to a rival but president Obama takes the cake!

Some psychiatric conditions are closely linked with the blame game. People with social disorders, for example, are usually tempted to blame other people for their failures or struggles with society, and the blame game is especially closely linked with bipolar-disorder. Members of Obama’s cabinet and those that must deal with this president on a daily basis should be offered some kind of psychiatric care (under Obamacare, of course) to help them deal with the Blame Game King of America and his other issues, like smoking, lying & laziness~ which are also very common with the mentally ill.

President Obama has passed the buck to others – mainly George W. Bush –  so many times that I’ve lost count~ problems that characterize his presidency, suggesting time and again that his own policies are not to blame for his difficulties and that he is simply doing the best that can be done with the cards he was dealt by former President Bush & the Republicans.

Even so, Obama has aggressively staked claims for successes for which Bush shares significant or nearly all responsibility, including increased drilling for oil and natural gas, the end of the Iraq War, and the killing of Osama Bin Laden just to name a few.

Now, Obama has stated publically that “he has a phone and a pen” and that he will use these to by-pass congress and pass any law that he pleases. THAT, my fellow Americans is what a dictator says. And THAT, is another step closer to the “Socialist States of America!”

Indeed, Obama will have no one to blame except himself if ignores his duty as president under our constitution and his plan actually backfires on him. However; who do you think the American people will blame if he is successful in stomping on the USS Constitution and throwing the laws of the land under the “bus”? Our founders & countrymen (and women) fought a revolution against England for the freedoms that today, many Americans take for granted.   Indeed, millions of Americans have died since our founding in wars of freedom both here in America and throughout the world. Please~ tell me that we will not dishonor the memories of our fallen soldiers, sailors & airmen throughout the years by allowing Obama & his socialistic agenda to ignore American Laws & Values. Please~ tell me that if we keep silent and allow him to use his “phone & his pen” in lieu of obeying the laws of the United States of America~ that we have no one to blame but ourselves!

“The goal of the ‘liberals’ — as it emerges from the record of the past decades — was to smuggle this country into welfare statism by means of single, concrete, specific measures, enlarging the power of the government a step at a time, never permitting these steps to be summed up into principles, never permitting their direction to be identified or the basic issue to be named. Thus, statism was to come, not by vote or by violence, but by slow rot — by a long process of evasion and epistemological corruption, leading to a fait accompli.” 

~author and philosopher Ayn Rand (1905-1982)

OBAMA may be the laziest president in U.S. history and I believe the first truly socialist one to occupy the White House. He long ago touted his belief in a single-payer system ‘aka’ socialized medicine, which leads me to believe that he studied Hitler and Nazi Germany very well. Obama Care is the revived version of the T-4 Program. Hitler would be very proud.

Hitler was very smart, he knew that before he could get Germans to accept the concentration camps, he had to first get them to think of themselves as gods deciding who would live and who would die through the control of a national healthcare system. The creation of the T-4 Program, or the German Universal Healthcare System – did just that. In July of 1939, a conference of medical professionals was held in Berlin, Germany. Participating were the professors and chairmen of the departments of psychiatry of the leading universities and medical schools of Germany, many of them, the most respected professionals in their fields. The subject? What would be the criteria for determining what patients would be considered to have “lives unworthy to be lived,” and what was the most “practical and cheap” manner of removing them from being burdens on the health-care system—by death.

Thus, the bureaucratic machine began to be cranked up for what is known as Adolf Hitler’s program of genocide through “euthanasia,” a program which killed hundreds of thousands of non-Jewish Germans, and eventually, millions of Jews and non-Germans as well.

That program, which had already begun years before, against concentration camp inmates and handicapped children, was officially put into effect in October 1939, when Hitler penned his own personal, and secret, authorization for the program, under the title, “The Destruction of Lives Unworthy of Life”: 

Reichsleiter Bouhler and Dr. Brandt are charged with the responsibility for expanding the authority of physicians, to be designated by name, to the end that patients considered incurable according to the best available human judgment of their state of health, can be accorded a mercy death. ~ Adolph Hitler

To carry out this program, Hitler and his fiendish Nazi associates would fully utilize the “professional” apparatus which had been put in place, as well as the popular, British-eugenics-spawned ideology which had been increasingly dominant in Germany since Hitler seized power with the aid of powerful British-Wall Street financiers. The killing would proceed with the utmost “cost-effectiveness” and professionalism, in order to save funds for the Nazi state’s preferred projects, and not waste them on “ineffective” medical treatments.

If that sounds familiar, it should. The Affordable Care Act which was signed into law by President Barack Hussein Obama on March 23, 2010, was passed along party lines by a majority democratic Congress & Senate. Those who voted in favor had not even read the bill or the possible future consequences therein, but instead were in a virtual lockstep with the Obama Administration’s vision of a single payer system.  With the stroke of his 22 pens, Obama has sealed the fates all Americans by taking away our freedom of choice and forcing us all to purchase a ‘product” or be fined (taxed) as a penalty!  First, the  Affordable Care Act “experts” decide what is “effective” care, with “cost-effectiveness” foremost in mind, ruling out “inappropriate” treatments. These standards become the law, in terms of what medical care will be paid for. Then other experts efficiently implement those decisions, through the existing hospital apparatus. The result, as in Nazi Germany, is that millions are, with the stroke of a pen, consigned to death. Those ‘death panels’ that the conservative groups had warned everyone about will be a reality; mark my words! ~dfh~

Hitler’s T4 Program

The T4 program, which was established following Hitler’s secret order, took its name from its Berlin office address, Tiergarten 4, which address housed the coordinating organization for the program, the Reich Work Group of Sanatoriums and Nursing Homes. In charge were Philip Bouhler, chief of the Chancellery, and Dr. Karl Brandt, Hitler’s personal physician and chief medical officer of the land.

Their first task was to devise the questionnaires which would be used to categorize the targeted institutionalized populations. Four categories were specified:

1. Patients suffering from specified diseases who are not employable, or are employable only in simple mechanical work. These included schizophrenia, epilepsy, senile diseases, therapy-resistant paralysis, feeble-mindedness, and the like.
2. Patients who have been continually institutionalized for at least five years.
3. Patients who are criminally insane.
4. Non-German patients.

While including these categorizations, the questionnaire overall gave the impression of a rather neutral statistical survey, which also delved into the patients’ biographies, their financial situations, eerily similar to Obama’s, (www.healthcare.org)  website, it was accompanied by a questionnaire for the institution in which the patient was housed, which asked about staffing, beds available, and budgetary questions. A significant stress was also put on detailing the patients’ abilities to work.

The first questionnaires went out in October 1939, the month Hitler signed his order, to state hospitals and other public and private institutions where mental patients, epileptics, the mentally retarded, and other handicapped persons resided. The responsibility for filling them out, often in a very short period of time, fell on the physicians at those institutions.

The questionnaires were then sent to panels of three or four psychiatric experts, who indicated their opinion about whether the patient (whom they had never seen, much less examined, and whose medical history they were unfamiliar with) was to live or die. Each “expert” made his or her decision independently, and passed on the questionnaire to the next. The choice for the experts was effectively only one of two options: a plus sign in red, which meant death; or a dash in blue, which meant life. Occasionally, a psychiatrist would put a question mark in the space provided.

The questionnaires were then sent to a chief expert, who passed the final judgment. At this “higher” level, there was no alternative other than life or death. In fact, the “senior expert” was not bound by the recommended decisions. From his judgment, there was no appeal. From that point on, it was merely a matter of sending back the decision to the relevant institution, where the final dispensation of the patient was carried out, and, if so ordered, sending him or her to one of the designated “killing centers.”

These centers were supervised by medical personnel, who oversaw the killing, and were responsible for devising the fraudulent death certificates which were sent to the families of those who had been determined to have lives “not worthy to be lived.” (Sounds like death panels to me!)

Councils of Experts

Shift now to today, where we are in the first phases of the Nazi euthanasia program (called “reform”) being promoted by the Obama Administration and its behavioral psychologist “experts.” It starts with the dictum that there are insufficient resources to provide medical care for all, especially those at the “end of life,” or not able to be “effectively” rehabilitated. In other words, the Nazi assumption that there are lives “not worthy to be lived.” At least according to the priorities for spending which the Administration has set—i.e., the banks must be saved first.

The second step is for the Administration to set up those “panels of experts” who will determine the criteria for who will get medical care, and who won’t. Already, the so-called Obama stimulus package has created one such panel, the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. This 15-member council is comprised of highly credentialed “experts,” many of them medical doctors, who are tasked with “coordinating research” on the relative values of treatments. While explicitly claiming that the Council will not directly pronounce judgments on treatments and payments, it is clear that the research that they are supervising is intended to do precisely that.

Particularly ominous is the fact that one of the Council’s members, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, is trained in “bioethics,” a discipline dedicated precisely to determining criteria for deciding who should live, and who should die. Crucially significant as well, is that Obama’s head of the Office of Management and Budget, Peter Orszag, has already set out his genocidal judgment that around 30% of current health-care services and procedures are unnecessary.

The model for their work, as reflected in statements by many of the relevant officials, is the British National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), the Orwellian-named agency which has central control over what medical care will be provided to British subjects within the British National Health Service. As the following article explains, NICE’s directives have systematically denied Britons quality care, on the basis of its being “too expensive,” and have singled out, especially, the elderly, for being undeserving of intensive medical care.

The Comparative Effectiveness Council is clearly only the beginning of the genocide—if this Nazi plan is not stopped cold. source – EIR

Paul Harvey (1918 – 2009) was a conservative radio broadcaster for ABC radio news. His commentary was broadcast  on the air mornings, mid-day & Saturdays from the 1950’s through the 1990’s. Following the assignation of John F. Kennedy and with the Vietnam War waging and the birth of the “sexual revolution” of the 1960’s, Mr. Harvey worried about big government, leftist radicals & permissive parents. Always the champion of individualism, love of God & country and the decency of ordinary people he usually personalized his commentary with his conservative views & opinions.

On April 3, 1965, Harvey broadcast his now famous “If I Were the Devil” commentary about how the devil would take over the United States. Listening to this today is chilling because it is; exactly what has happened in America since its original broadcast. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJc8Mzg0C-c&feature=player_embedded

Below is a transcript of that broadcast. 

If I were the Devil . . . I mean, if I were the Prince of Darkness, I would of course, want to engulf the whole earth in darkness. I would have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree, so I should set about however necessary to take over the United States. I would begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.” “Do as you please.” To the young, I would whisper, “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what is bad is good, and what is good is “square”. In the ears of the young marrieds, I would whisper that work is debasing, that cocktail parties are good for you. I would caution them not to be extreme in religion, in patriotism, in moral conduct. And the old, I would teach to pray. I would teach them to say after me: “Our Father, which art in Washington” . . .

 If I were the devil, I’d educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull an uninteresting. I’d threaten T.V. with dirtier movies and vice versa. And then, if I were the devil, I’d get organized. I’d infiltrate unions and urge more loafing and less work, because idle hands usually work for me. I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. And I’d tranquilize the rest with pills. If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects but neglect to discipline emotions . . . let those run wild. I would designate an atheist to front for me before the highest courts in the land and I would get preachers to say “she’s right.” With flattery and promises of power, I could get the courts to rule what I construe as against God and in favor of pornography, and thus, I would evict God from the courthouse, and then from the school house, and then from the houses of Congress and then, in His own churches I would substitute psychology for religion, and I would deify science because that way men would become smart enough to create super weapons but not wise enough to control them.

 If I were Satan, I’d make the symbol of Easter an egg, and the symbol of Christmas, a bottle. If I were the devil, I would take from those who have and I would give to those who wanted, until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. And then, my police state would force everybody back to work. Then, I could separate families, putting children in uniform, women in coal mines, and objectors in slave camps. In other words, if I were Satan, I’d just keep on doing what he’s doing.

Paul Harvey, Good Day.

Americans will soon have standing to destroy Obamacare. The American people can stop Obamacare. It will take some guts and some risk, but we can shut it down tomorrow. Let me explain.

In National Federation of Independent Business et al v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., the Supreme Court ruled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) penalties to be a tax, not a penalty. Chief Justice Roberts was chastised for this action. It has always been my belief that Justice Roberts’s actions and opinion was brilliant and eventually history would vindicate his decision and his wisdom.

Roberts gave America a skillfully crafted opinion and the opportunity to shut down the law. He also avoided having his court—a court that he will preside  over until he retires or dies—from being accused of legislating from the  bench; at least by liberals who were stoking the fires of discontent during the  US Supreme Court Obamacare hearings.

The U.S. Constitution’s Origination Clause (Art. I, Sec 7) require all tax bills to originate in the House of Representatives. Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act originated in the Senate making the laws tax unconstitutional. No argument was made over the penalty provision of the law. Only that the laws mandate was unconstitutional.

All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

–Article 1, Section 7

No one thought to argue that the penalties were in fact a tax. During the legislative process, the Democrats fought long and hard to convince Americans that they “would not be taxed.” Remember? Democrats and the liberal media told the country—repeatedly–that people who did not sign up would pay a penalty, not a tax.

Chief Justice Roberts has set the stage, for what I believe, can be a massive citizen effort to bring suit to overturn the heart and soul of Obamacare legislation for the enforcement of the illegal tax provision of the law. So why has this provision of Obamacare gone unchallenged?

To bring a successful suit seeking remedy from a court, the party or parties to the suit must have legal standing. Basically, a plaintiff must show that they have suffered some direct or substantial injury or be likely to suffer such injury if a particular wrong is not redressed. Moreover, a defendant must also be shown to be the party responsible for Article from perpetrating the alleged wrong doing.  Without standing, a case has no merit and more than likely would be dismissed.

Written by John De Mayo of the Freedom Outpost/October 6, 2013;

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/americans-will-soon-standing-destroy-obamacare/

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/americans-will-soon-standing-destroy-obamacare/#ixzz2hqr1KCKl Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/americans-will-soon-standing-destroy-obamacare/#zYWvgo3sZ1PsBVU3.99